Country expert evidence for UK Immigration & Asylum Tribunals.

Independent reports and oral testimony for solicitors, barristers, and OISC Level 3 advisers instructing before the First-tier Tribunal (FtTIAC), Upper Tribunal (UTIAC), and the High Court — across England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.

Instruct an Expert

CPR Part 35 Compliance

Map table used for UK-facing country research — Photo via Unsplash

UK practice

CPR Part 35 & Duty to Court

Independence under Statement of Truth and Practice Direction 35

UK practice

First-tier & Upper Tribunal

Evidence prepared for FtTIAC hearings and UTIAC appeals

UK practice

LAA Rates & Prior Authority

Legal Aid Agency instructions accepted with transparent fees

Core Services

EvidencepreparedtoUKtribunalstandards

Structured country expertise for challenging Home Office refusals, CPIN assessments, and removal decisions in UK proceedings.

Legal research documents on a desk — Photo via Unsplash

Service 01

Expert Country Condition Reports

Asylum and human rights country evidence prepared for FtTIAC and UTIAC bundles.

Research materials under review — Photo via Unsplash

Service 02

Home Office CPIN Critique & Rebuttal

Independent critique of Country Policy and Information Notes with field-sourced counter-evidence.

Courthouse architecture for tribunal proceedings — Photo via Unsplash

Service 03

Tribunal Oral Testimony & Affidavits

Hearing attendance and affidavits for Upper Tribunal and High Court judicial review.

Law books representing legal aid practice — Photo via Unsplash

Service 04

LAA-Funded Instructions

Reports aligned to Legal Aid Agency codified rates and Prior Authority pathways.

Overriding Duty — CPR Part 35

“I understand that my duty is to help the court on matters within my expertise, and that this duty overrides any obligation to the person from whom I have received instructions or by whom I am paid.”

Statement of Truth · Practice Direction 35 · Ikarian Reefer principles

Read full CPR Part 35 compliance statement

Legal archive shelves representing country research — Photo via Unsplash

CPIN Analysis

Challenging Home Office Country Policy and Information Notes

Independent expert evidence addresses currency gaps, sourcing weaknesses, and material omissions in CPIN assessments used in UK tribunal decisions.

CPIN Critique

Illustrative methodology — Matter of [Redacted]

CPIN · Country X · Return / Relocation (illustrative)

Home Office CPIN

Policy note asserts generalised safety on internal relocation without current field sourcing on targeted risk profiles.

Expert Field Evidence

Report tests CPIN propositions against contemporaneous open-source intelligence, language-fluent field research, and tribunal-facing risk analysis for Appellant AA (Country).

Methodology aligns with Upper Tribunal expectations for country evidence, including engagement with authorities such as MOJ & Ors (Return to Somalia) on the evaluation of country materials.

Explore CPIN rebuttal services

Legal Aid

Transparent LAA rate compliance

Instructions from Legal Aid Agency funded practitioners across the United Kingdom are accepted. Rates follow LAA codified expert fee structures, with Prior Authority pathways for complex multi-issue country reports.

Legal Aid Agency (LAA) Instructions Accepted

Reports can be prepared within standard LAA codified hourly rates or subject to Prior Authority applications for complex cases. Practitioners are encouraged to seek Prior Authority early where case complexity is likely to exceed standard hours.

LAA-funded instructions

Start instruction